The Fallacy of Analytical Marketing
While researching for a post on consumer and business spending in times of a recession, Google search made me stumble upon a sales pitch for an Analytical Marketing company:
“In today’s hyper-changing market scenario companies need to invest in data-based analytical marketing without which their ability to respond to quick changes in customer behaviour will be limited!”
Excuse me? A lot of FUD – fear, uncertainty and doubt being spread.
Supposedly, Analytical Marketing will be the biggest competitive advantage enterprises will have in the next decade and that only those will be able to improve profit and growth who can organize and leverage customer information. The marketing pitch claims that ‘tomorrow’s business decisions are driven by models that encapsulate yesterday’s reality.’ Hmm, interesting. Apparently a fundamental shift in consumer behavior is taking place, which might or might not be true, but how would a model that ‘encapsulates YESTERDAY’s reality’ help tomorrow’s business decisions? If a shift is taking place then would yesterday’s model not be wrong for today and certainly for tomorrow? Yes, consumers are spending less money and some understanding who is still spending on what could help a business to market to better fitting classes of customers. I propose that the problem is much rather related to customer to business communication and not vice versa.
The sales pitch foolishly tries to present economic expertise but misquoted Keynes’ ‘Paradox of Thrift’ as an example for consumer irrationality and to prove that yesterdays analytic methods are out of date. Oops! Keynes stated that principle in 1936, therefore irrational customer behavior would not really be new, right? While Keynes’ ideas are opposed by economists such as Milton Friedmann, the ‘Paradox of Thrift’ is not about irrationality of consumers, but about the question whether less consumer spending in a recession will actually increase savings and if and how politics should deal with the consequences for the economy. The paradoxical part is not the relationship of savings to business investment but the fact that the problem of changes in consumer spending is supposed to be solved by the analytical mass marketing means that created it! Consumers are saying that they will be more careful when making buying decisions and that they won’t max out their credit cards anymore to buy stuff they don’t really need. Which means that they are buying less of the crap that has been marketed to them with the help of analytical tools.
Let me reiterate here that the problem of data mining and analytical marketing is actually threefold:
- First, you need some kind of model – no amount of data mining can give you that. It is a theory that you have to come up with. Some propose that the best way to define those is to employ mathematicians. What? Mathematicians are the most unimaginative people on this planet.
- Second, you need to collect data. But which data? In what intervals. From where? What do the data mean? Will a trend follow through? Do they correlate in any way? Mapping collected data to the model is pure guessing.
- Third, most of the data are of poor quality and there actually is NO WAY of knowing how good your data are. The more you try to ‘fix the data in the mix’ meaning in the data warehouse with sampling, averaging and merging the more meaningless they get.
And to top it all off, there is the claim that being able to work with analytical data and the fitting visualization tools will be a boost for your career, because you will dazzle some board member with flashy charts. That does not portray board members as very intelligent, right? It is however in line with ‘The Economists’ observation that CEOs of many large enterprises are hopelessly inept and have no idea what is going on. All those charts may be flashy, but they will still be wrong. Even if the data are correct the model that projects them into the future is theory. Data and charts won’t improve the bottom line and growth or improve the economy. How should they? What knowledge would you gain that makes people part with money they don’t have? Supposedly, the knowledge could help your customers to be more thrifty and save money. Damn, according to Keynes that would not help the economy either! The only thing that will improve your business is a motivating leader with an intuitive mind and a customer focus.
Ebay has 5 petabytes of data stored. I have not seen any sensible marketing out of that. Walmart also has petabytes but I still wouldn’t shop there. The others all know that Walmart is cheap! Let me ask you: Would it not be better to spend the money on IT investments that improve product quality, customer communication and service rather than on analytical mass marketing?
A serious change in customer behavior IS NOT a goldmine, it is a message and businesses should better listen!