Why Adaptive Case Management?

What keeps the managers, directors and executives of a business awake at night, tossing and turning? The long-range questions about where the ecomony is going and what the competition is or will be doing? Does anyone think they are wondering if they should install BPM or ACM? Much more likely their twisted bedsheets will be caused by the two related questions:

  1. Are we doing the right things?
  2. Are we doing things right?

One cannot separate these two questions and consider one or the other as more or less important. Yes, 1. ought to be asked first with 2. right thereafter. Not to do so is similar to considering effectiveness and efficiency independently. That is unfortunately one of the major fallacies of business management today. Too often efficiency is the only consideration when poor effectiveness might be the cause for the lack of profitability. The efficiency and cost-cutting focus applied in too many BPM implementations would tie knowledge workers into straight jackets and kick them downhill, while bureaucrats folly over their rolling speed in governance meetings. Makes me still wonder …

Doing the right things right can only be improved by one essential element of business management: TRANSPARENCY. Is transparency about management demanding information from the business units? No, transparency has to start from the top down. Executives first need to make their strategy, directors their targets and managers (process owners) their goals transparent to those who execute. That consolidated view allows to look at the things the business is doing to discuss if they are being done right. A business even should be as transparent as sensibly possible to its customers.

ACM provides real-time transparency and empowerment!

Information about how things are going makes only sense in one way: REAL-TIME! There is little benefit in knowing that things went wrong last year by means of business intelligence, but one ought to know right at the moment they go wrong to enable steps to make them right! How can one ensure that things that go wrong are being corrected? The people with the right knowhow need to be empowered to take ACTION. But which action will get things right? Who knows? Will it always be same action that fixes an apparently similar problem? Can a rigid, flowcharted execution ensure that nothing goes wrong? Not likely, except for a few simple business activities like moving a box from one room the other. Empowering the right people to do the right things right puts the organization into auto-pilot.  Empowerment is not about using Twitter, YouTube and iPhone apps but about authority, goals and means.

To know if the business is doing right things right for a certain outcome needs immediate feedback from the customer. Does that mean that the customer ought to be real-time connected to the customer-focused processes of your business? Yes, that is exactly what focused means.

At this point Adaptive Case Management comes into play. It is essentially empowerment technology that puts the customers and actors in the driver seat. No amount of social networking will improve flowcharted processes before, during or after things went wrong. ACM allows the business to empower selectively and securely all the people that do things and those for whom things are being done. ACM is about communication and process as ONE! ACM leaves the automation of the low-value, highly repetitive administration tasks to BPM, but it provides the platform for the high-value, unique and skill or knowledge intensive customer service processes. That is where customer loyalty is being created and maintained.

But that is not the only place the ACM empowers, because it also interconnects the management layers and enables continuous  innovation and optimization without ANY bureaucratic governance overhead. Reorganizing a business could become an exercise that executives and directors can perform by rearranging tactical targets on their iPad.

Sounds like a dream? Yes, it does. Doesn’t it?

PS: I have just created a blog solely dedicated to ACM because my interests here are too broad.

I am the founder and Chief Technology Officer of Papyrus Software, a medium size software company offering solutions in communications and process management around the globe. I am also the owner and CEO of MJP Racing, a motorsports company focused on Rallycross or RX, a form of circuit racing on mixed surfaces that has been around for 40 years. I hold 8 national and international championship titles in RX. My team participates in the World Championship along Petter Solberg, Sebastian Loeb and Ken Block.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Adaptive Case Management, Executives
6 comments on “Why Adaptive Case Management?
  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freddie van Rijswijk, Max J. Pucher. Max J. Pucher said: Why Adaptive Case Managemnt? http://lnkd.in/ZnTxHi […]


  2. Johnker says:

    “ACM is about communication and process as ONE!” – EXACTLY!

    Certainly, Adaptive Case Management is the same as the collaborative business process management. This concept can be used instead of BPEL4People – extension of BPEL for collaboration.


    • John, sorry to burst your bubble. Collaborative alone is not adaptive! If you read my post then it should be pretty clear that ACM is about business people being able to create and innovate processes as they see fit, but with the link to strategic goals and business/data architecture. Thanks for reading and commenting. Max


  3. Johnker says:

    >>Collaborative alone is not adaptive!

    Surely. And Case Management (or Business Process Management) without collaboration tools is not adaptive too – because adaptive supposes collaboration (discussions as minimum) – “to make their strategy, targets and goals transparent to those who execute”

    Thank you for response, Max


    • John, thanks. Yes, collaboration is one needed element, but it has to be about defined business entities and goals and that requires a defined business architecture. Adaptive does not suppose collaboration, because that is only an ability relating to the CURRENT process. The key element of ADAPTIVE is the ability for business users to influence FUTURE process executions by various means and without needing IT.

      Adaptive is required to provide the evolutionary ability in a process infrastructure without needing a governance bureaucracy. Thanks again, Max


  4. Jonker,
    It seems to be that adaptive case management can work with BPM – not that they are enemies or BPMS only works for transactional process. What is your thought on this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Max J. Pucher
© 2007-19

by Max J. Pucher. All rights reserved.

Real World Statistics
  • 234,257 readers

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 367 other followers

ISIS Papyrus on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: